"We're concerned about the practical implications of individual states being able to take candidates off the ballot."
"But the practical implications of your ruling basically erases a constitutional amendment."
"Oh no! Anyway..."
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
"We're concerned about the practical implications of individual states being able to take candidates off the ballot."
"But the practical implications of your ruling basically erases a constitutional amendment."
"Oh no! Anyway..."
Nothing more constitutional than nullifying the Constitution.
The doublethink being flagrantly exhibited by the court at this point should beggar belief… but honestly, I don’t think anybody is surprised anymore. To be perfectly frank: we expect it. Overall national confidence in the integrity of the Supreme Court is fairly shattered nowadays.
I guess Roberts’s plan to burnish his historical legacy is to help the Republic of Gilead establish itself and ask them to build him a statue in exchange. What a fucking limpdick.
The Roberts court is illegitimate.
Period.
No, those are banned now too
I would never have seen this coming!