this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
383 points (97.3% liked)

News

23310 readers
5070 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 142 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Corporations cut corners because the fines they're issued by the government don't go far enough. They get a slap on the wrist and work it out in the wash.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It feels like I’m always writing the same thing but : Cost of doing business.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

Paraphrasing what I said and almost typed. I felt it obvious because I too say it constantly.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago

Corporations cut corners because the fines they're issued by the government don't go far enough.

But in the example for the shipping company the example is that the company used a minimum amount of crew. Using a minimum amount of crew isn't something they'd get fined for.

If the regulation wasn't enough or if tugs should've been used then it's strange to claim that the fine isn't high enough. As the regulations were followed.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

We've already seen reports that laws on the books for disasters like the Titanic to limit liability of the corporations...

They spend all their profits on lobbying lawmakers to always cut them a break.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Why don't we treat stuff like this like car collisions? The owner of the ship should be on the hook for the entire bridge cost plus loss of life.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Because corporate personhood is different than person personhood?

I always find it interesting to take corporate fines, translate them to a % of gross income and then apply it to my salary to put it in perspective.

Here’s the best part, a basic 1st offense traffic ticket is usually way more expensive. (I assume a ticket would be around $250 not counting the increased insurance rates.)

[–] [email protected] 44 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Corporations are people up to and until they have to face any consequences.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago

Ay and then they become rich people...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Because corporate personhood is different than person personhood?

Yes, in the sense that the former is fictional bullshit regardless of what the increasingly-illegitimate Supreme Court says.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It gets a little weird with the web of ownership, use case, contract details and people involved.

Ok it can get really weird… hear me out.

Basically in most cases the vessel owner is only liable up to value of the vessel itself. It’s something that like much of the maritime industry came about from practices in the 19th century and vessel ownership back then. Unfortunately, the vessel is likely worth no where near as much as taking out a fucking bridge. Also in any given scenario a vessel could be owned by the captain, owned by a corp, leased by a corp to a captain, leased by a corp to another corp etc. weird ownership scenarios like those are commonplace in shipping.

In certain circumstances a company can be on the hook but the other big wrinkle is determining who is liable in the first place like the vessel crew, or port crew (but for instance if someone from on shore is working on the vessel at the time they are considered acting crewmembers). This is compounded with the whole mechanical error issue and how supposedly the vessel was having maintenance work done before hand, but then lost power twice? Insurance inspectors are going bonkers at this point.

Point is this is a way wackier scenario to deal with compared to your average fender bender. But in a way kinda has to be, not because of lobbying or corporate malfeasance but because of the complex nature of maritime law, shipping, and insurance.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Thanks for such an interesting perspective. That's pretty complex, but also it makes sense now that I think about it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They will be. Although, much like with car collisions, it'll be insurance that's on the hook.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Before that they have to figure who actually owns the ship. Which may or may not be easy.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 7 months ago (2 children)

On Wednesday, Maryland State Police recovered the bodies of Alejandro Hernandez Fuentes and Dorlian Ronial Castillo Cabrera inside a pick-up truck submerged 50 feet beneath the Patapsco River.

Fuck, i have nightmares about this kind of shit. Poor guys

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago (3 children)

In the early 2000's I was working at a saw mill in northwestern Ontario that was a 200 km (120 mile) round trip from home, on a 2 lane highway that zig-zagged through the Canadian shield. There were often lakes on one side and steep ravines on the other, and we often had to dodge moose in the winter (who were kneeling in the middle of the highway licking salt off the road).

One of my crew taught me a valuable lesson then ... that the minute you put the vehicle into drive you also unlock your electric doors, so that if you do end up in the water there is a chance you can get out of the vehicle.

I still do it to this day.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

That fucked me all up when I rolled a car.

I was upside down and the emergency fuel pump shutoff had already triggered, but I was freaking out because I couldn’t open the door.

I tried punching out the glass and that didn’t work so finally I thought I had better shut this car off before it catches on fire.

Then I reached up to turn the key off and heard the doors unlock.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Shit that’s good advice. My car does the auto lock shit and I bet if the electronics got fried when we went into the water I’d be screwed

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

My mother used to keep a brick in the car for this reason. I probably should too.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago (3 children)

they make glass break tools that are much better. They usually also have integrated seat belt cutters. Probably less expensive than a brick. They look like tiny plastic hammers with a hardened bearing as the striking surface.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Resqme is the best from what I’ve heard. No hammer shape, just press to the window and push.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

If it works, it works.

The spring loaded things are basically automatic center punches.

Whatever you do get, simplicity and ease of use should be top of mind.

Remember , in a crash you’re probably dazed from the impact (and air bag,) and jonsing on adrenaline. Basically, you become a total moron.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'll look into that. Thanks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Further to this if you have an old spark plug at home, crack the white ceramic part off the spark plug with a hammer and the little shards (also known as ninja rocks) will break glass when thrown or hammered against the window.
They work because their 'hardness' is higher than the window glass and cause it to shatter. Also breaking a car window with a brick is much harder than it appears (i locked my keys in my car once a few hours from home, and it didnt work after repeated attempts).

Another thing (if your ever in the situation) car windscreens are designed to be pushed out from the inside, so if trapped just put your feet against the glass and push and it will pop right out.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Get a quality glass breaker and seatbelt cutter instead. Make sure you clip it or stick it somewhere so it can't move. Things have a tendency to shift around violently in a car-wreck, which is exactly why you shouldn't have a loose brick in your car.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

50 is an interesting number, considereding it's only about 35 feet deep under the bridge. I wonder if they were swept down stream a significant way

[–] [email protected] 24 points 7 months ago (2 children)

This kind of feels like it was written by a large language model. There's lots of content. But there's no through line. No cohesive narrative tying it all together.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago

Ironic when they're trying to talk about Corporations Cutting Corners, eh?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Yeah, I noticed the same thing. Lots of paragraphs that start with "[person/thing] is [context/role]". I wonder whether it's actually human written, but they poorly integrated too many individual perspectives into the article. Building a narrative from fragments in this way takes a lot of skill to pull off, perhaps they were too ambitious (or too cautious — I've seen this pitfall when the writer is too tentative in making their own argument on a spicy topic)

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It shows us again that we must have strong regulations and that the Market™ is a belief.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

The Market is real. An invisible hand guiding it is a belief.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

That's weird. I heard the bridge collapsed because the mayor is a black guy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Wtf, a container is bigger than most ships in there.