464
House intelligence chair says Republicans are ‘absolutely’ repeating Russian propaganda
(www.theguardian.com)
Duh. Now can we do something about it?
this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2024
464 points (98.9% liked)
politics
19172 readers
3478 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
WILLINGLY
They've been willingly regurgitating Russian Propaganda direct from the Kremlin for a very long time.
Because they're traitors.
So name the Russian propaganda and the people repeating it.
Trump and the insurrectionist squad
Yes, but it would help if talking points where specifically noted and the people propagating them.
Right and then - Hey there go the goalposts. Who woulda thunk it. Pass.
Naming and shaming should NOT be too much to ask. In fact, it should be step fucking one of this shit. Name and shame. Fuck off with accidentally running cover for evil morons.
We can start with the Republicans that went to Russia over the July 4th break a couple years ago. Rand Paul was the ringleader there.
Those traitors can fuck right off.
Who’s running cover for these turd circus clowns? Asking for examples when the past eight years are awash in them is not asking in good faith. Like, seriously, you can’t guess where to look, like at all? Not even in an internet search? Yeah right. Fuck off.
They didn't ask for examples from incredulity. People asking for names and examples understand that the court system needs actual evidence of actual crime.
Do you want to just shake your finger at horrible people and say, "shame", or actually figure out who said what and if what was illegal?
The fact you do not understand how holding someone to account means ACCOUNTING what they've done, you have some problems. This isn't fucking time to hide peoples' names.
Of course they are. Did we not see the old FOX news host literally go over to Russia to interview Putin and lap up every last bit of propaganda he fed him? They've been on Russian propaganda for years now.
Keeping saying it out loud. Who is saying the Russian propaganda too?
I think the simplest explanation here is that they're getting it from their voters....who are getting it from Russian propaganda, but they just don't care so long as they get reelected.
They haven't gotten shit from their voters in decades. They manufacture the issues then loop them on repeat in right wing media
If they could operate without any voters at all, they would...
They’re workin’ on it
Give them a few months. Throwing out election results they don't like is a huge priority for them this year.
The simplest answer is that they are getting it from Russian Propagandists. They repeat it because it riles their base and gets them engagement.
honestly they just seem to wanna pull another kissinger, no matter the cost
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Mike Turner, the chairperson of the US House intelligence committee, says some of his fellow Republicans are “absolutely” repeating Russian propaganda on the chamber floor, echoing a similar claim made recently by another rightwing American lawmaker.
“It is absolutely true we see, directly coming from Russia, attempts to mask communications that are anti-Ukraine and pro-Russia messages, some of which we even hear being uttered on the House floor,” the Ohio congressman told CNN’s State of the Union show.
His comments Sunday came days after Michael McCaul, chairman of the House foreign affairs committee, told Puck News that misinformation in favor of Russian interests had found a foothold among his fellow Republicans.
Both Turner and McCaul in their respective interviews suggested that pro-Putin propaganda was as hostile to the US’s position on the world stage as the threats posed by the regimes of Xi Jinping, China’s president, and Kim Jong-un, North Korea’s leader.
Though Turner did not single out any members of Congress or his party Sunday, his remarks came after Marjorie Taylor Greene, the far-right Georgia representative, recently filed a motion to oust Mike Johnson from his role as House speaker if the Louisiana Republican moved forward with a Ukraine aid bill.
Turner on Sunday expressed his belief that Johnson was not at “any risk” of having the speaker’s gavel wrested from him by what he called members of the “chaos caucus … who are seeking attention for themselves and trying to stop all of the important work in Congress”.
The original article contains 445 words, the summary contains 250 words. Saved 44%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Thank God there is an intelligence chair in there.