Only one person fought here. It's the one who brain farted so hard he did not get the movie quote, even though it is a direct reply to the quote that they were referencing originally. And yes, them getting offended over their own mistake, that's kinda funny.
DarkThoughts
Afaik he's doing "just" minor updates now, so bugfixing, polish, and whatnot. No new content.
Use code blocks please.
Markdown itself is very old and afaik does not actually support spoiler tags (I don't think they were even a thing at the time). So every implementation of spoiler tags is just their own cooked up mess.
Nope. Completely different continent even. Shuffling originates from Melbourne, Australia - hence the original name "Melbourne Shuffle". It was usually danced to hardstyle music before a certain pop song popularized a very toned down version for the mainstream audiences.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melbourne_shuffle Some old / original use case videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPaMdxC6CQI
The only quote on quote "official" foreign troops in Ukraine that we know of are UK troops programming Stormshadow missiles. Everyone else we know of are all private volunteers who joined Ukraine's army on their own. If NATO had actual troop involvement in Ukraine this war would be very quickly over (and I personally think we're just wasting lives & time for what is inevitably needed anyway).
so just choosing how to exactly limit the question changes if "help in war" was provided?
No. It's based on the "help in war" that is actually received. Russia receives actual North Korean troops to fight for them.
what if western countries just helped with some nukes instead of only some normal rockets or whatever was sent there to help? what if western countries troops quick-changed their passports to be ukrainians instead?(guess that secret agencies already have enough passport printing capabilities,or just get them printed on demand), would that be sufficient to say no "western" troops were sent even if it were millions of soldiers "from" the west?
I like how you have to make up various made up straw man scenarios to counter something that is actually happening in real life. Ironically this is very much projection too, since Russia did more or less exactly that with their "little green men" since 2014.
but living in a propagandainfested country i'ld already expect such bad manipulations to happen instantaneous.
You mean RuZZia? lol
what if western countries didn't send "troops to the front" but to the rest of the country so that invading military would have to fight western troops while ukrainian troops could concentrate on the front. would that also not be help in war by your (seemingly) position?
Again. You make up a scenario that did not happen. But since you likely try to say that those made up scenarios would make it consequently okay for Russia to use those NK troops, then them using those troops anyway (which they do) means the West is allowed to actually put troops on the ground to liberate Ukrainian territory? :)
or the other way around: what if one would only call the directly by russian soldiers occupied area (like 1m² where they each actually stand) would that still be an invasion or just a US-style visit with US style damaging of democracy and economics? manipulating questions is a bad propaganda habit and does not prevent wars, it creates them.
Call? Like a telephone call? Or calling it a name? Please translate more coherently.
It doesn't even matter in this day and age. Claims have no meaning anymore since borders are internationally recognized as they are and only legitimately changed through diplomacy, not through acts of war. In this case, Russia very much, on multiple occasions, acknowledged the borders (including Crimea) and Ukraine's sovereignty - including their potential wish to join NATO (I don't remember if it was Lavrov who said it, it was some old interview).
Right. But that doesn't really make sense to blame them when they had no power to prevent this either. This should be put onto the actual politicians and all the voters who did not vote for Green politicians (which I would guess includes a lot of the people now trying to scapegoat the royalties here).
Happy 700k casualties day everyone!
Does the Spanish royalty have any actual power?
I haven't either, but the screenshot very clearly states the situation though and OP also provided the referenced scene in a comment an hour before they commented.