Waryle

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

That's not brain drain. Brain drain is when high qualified people leave their country, mostly because of the lack of infrastructures costing them opportunities for studying or working in their respective field.

What you're talking about is capital flight. This is an issue that is systematically raised as a counter-argument by liberals in debates on taxation. The problem is that it is seriously overestimated:

  • Leaving a country is a lot more complicated than it sounds: you lose your family, your friends, your culture, your habits. Many millionaires who leave their country end up coming back after a few years.
  • You can't relocate your real estate investments.
  • Going abroad doesn't exempt you from paying taxes (especially exit taxes).
  • A country that wishes to do so can prohibit the relocation of a profitable company, or even nationalize it.
  • Many rich people who threaten to leave if taxes are raised end up doing the math: if there's a profitable business, they'll stay. And in a country that finances its infrastructure soundly and has a good distribution of wealth, there's profitable business to be had.
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

While true, how is that any different to the arguments that were used for TV?

Television is bad because it is a passive activity, but it is less harmful than the continuous ingestion of micro-videos. But I don't see what it has to do here.

Additionally, Lemmy is a social network in the same way that Reddit is. Is this not also dangerous?

What's the connection? I didn't mention Reddit.

As has been the recommendation for practically everything for the four decades I've been on this earth, moderation is key. Instead of hating new media, either regulate it (if the evidence is truly that great) or treat it with healthy moderation.

This would be to ignore the particularly addictive nature of this kind of content. It would be like comparing apples to Snickers: both are sweet, yes, but one is much more problematic.

Let's be blunt here. Most of the people in this thread aren't worried about health

That could be a point, but I'm pretty sure that if you ask anybody, the main reason given would be that it makes you stupid. But I can agree that this opinion would not necessarily be based on anything other than the eternal contempt for novelty as video games or manga were, for example, before they became popular.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

ITT: People in their mid-twenties or later, who feel superior to those that like one form of media over their preferred media.

You're just waving away an important fact, which is that shorts and their equivalents are notoriously known for killing attention spans and disrupting the management of dopamine in the brain, causing depression in particular.

We are no longer simply in the traditional custom of the elderly who despise the activities of the younger generations, we are talking about health.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

I can shit inside a car and make it unbearable for everyone, that does not make me the one who controls the car.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

There is a colossal difference between "the government CONTROLS the weather" and "the government participates in climate change"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)
  • Those are tires, not wheels.
  • 35% which uses them means that 65% don’t use them.
  • You said "no matter gear you have", so you can’t use that point.
  • With 20cm of fresh snow, even a normal car would be stuck. But if you tell me that you use a special car (a pick-up for example), I will argue that you can use a special bike (such as a fat bike) and roll with it without problem.
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And we could save a lot of people if they put on helmets to walk down stairs, and yet I don't see anyone saying that people are stupid not to wear them.

And your friend, if he drives at 30mph, of course he has to wear a helmet, but the subject is not a sporty practice of cycling, but bike commuting. And helmets does not protect you from a shitty infrastructure and tank-like cars that run you over, so maybe it would be good to stop insulting people and bring some nuance to this debate.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (6 children)

Guess dutch people are stupid, but at least they have way less death per kilometer while cycling ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

J’ai été voir et :

Stop, my penis can only get so erect

view more: next ›