i think that milestone has already been achieved -- at least in terms of the expected quality of the final manuscript.
have you read the da vinci code?
i think that milestone has already been achieved -- at least in terms of the expected quality of the final manuscript.
have you read the da vinci code?
to be fair, vresda, plejdar, and numanumahey all sound like plausible alien species in a trek universe.
yep, it wasn't just a plain tiff.
double-negatives in the headline means a positive article.
tell me about it! i ordered a cherry π and received three and some bits of cherries instead!
that's totes the fault of the guy who can't understand what i mean when i'm trying to be esoteric!
i have one of those spongy yellow smiley balls to whom i vent. it just grins away and doesn't react otherwise. that leaves me relieved and calm to move on.
as an aside, it's also a helpful sounding board when i try and explain a problem. i should really give it the name "but why not?"
the people who sell them do not know how accurate the term "stress ball" is for the product.
huh. live and learn.
i guess for other species it's pizza?
turtles eat jellyfish?
The Washington Post first reported that Canadian officials alleged Indian Home Affairs Minister Amit Shah was behind a campaign of violence and intimidation targeting Sikh separatists in Canada.
Shah is not just a "senior member of Modi's cabinet". he's the architect behind Modi's tenure as prime minister since 2014. he's very much the king-maker in this story.
he's one of the stokers of the fervent right-wing saffron-tinged flame of hindutva that's consumed so many voters into blind allegiance over the last decade. he's smart, cunning, and perhaps one of the most dangerous persons alive today.
...1/1.56", 65mm...
i mean, just report the lens bore diameter in the same metric units as the focal length already.
In general, the report found that the AI summaries showed "a limited ability to analyze and summarize complex content requiring a deep understanding of context, subtle nuances, or implicit meaning." Even worse, the Llama summaries often "generated text that was grammatically correct, but on occasion factually inaccurate,"
how is this being accepted? one would have to go through any output with a fine-toothed comb anyway to weed out ai hallucinations, as well as to preserve nuance and context.
it's like the ai tells you that mona lisa has three eyes and a nose and her mouth is closed but her denim jacket is open. you're going to report that in your story without ever looking at the painting?
Hamala Karris?