sensibilidades

That's a nice straw man you made there. Unless, of course, you're specifically aware of anyone in this thread making that argument.

I bet it's 'unsinkable'

Dukat had more likable moments than Huffman.

I think all that would happen is billionaires would pay people to be their 'front' character and somehow find a way to monetize it on the down-low.

Ok, but the main reason I don’t eat raw eggs is because they’re not very appetizing.

Dumb question: what’s a mind map? i’ve heard of it, and seen some examples, but still have no real idea what one is for.

Literally none of this is surprising, I can’t see what difference it would make to publish a book about it. Trump’s obvious deficiencies are obvious, and he still has people who think he was somehow good. If unassailable evidence came out that he raped a child, for example, it wouldn’t hurt him politically. The GOP would still be all in on him.

it's a tough question, for sure. I mean, the Silicon Valley joke was about one person jerking off everybody instead of a massive circle jerk. I have no doubt linear algebra is required for a circle jerk of that magnitude.

middle out

the Silicon Valley-based memes already write themselves

Can't trust these companies to do what's right.

This has to be drilled into the collective consciousness as much as possible. There is no such thing as an ethical corporation, or an ethical company that is for-profit -- they simply cannot be ethical, they are amoral by design. If Target or Walmart or Netflix do something that is seen as positive, the only reason is a profit motive, not because they are moving towards being 'good'.

I must be in the minority here, I turned off sub-specific CSS as soon as I could.

you're trying to censor it because someone doesn't align with your political views

Then shouldn't people like 10A be fine with discussion of banning their stuff? That's literally all 'anti woke' bullshit is about, censoring ideas.