We regulate cars pretty heavily, we regulate guns decently.
When it comes to dogs, across the entire world, literally crickets chirping. No government does anything.
We regulate cars pretty heavily, we regulate guns decently.
When it comes to dogs, across the entire world, literally crickets chirping. No government does anything.
Ok I think it's fixed
Agreed, this gets frustrating sometimes because it's so common in a lot of articles talking about this issue.
Pretty much all female teachers, constantly scolded and lectured boys, said they were aggressive and misbehaved (honestly the boys were really mild in kindergarten)
Fast forward to seventh grade, the boys turned out exactly the way the teacher said but worse.
All female teachers through the years of elementary, except for like 1
Please stop bringing in body tropes into this.
Alot of assumptions made in this video and it's attempting to draw causation from simple correlations.
A few good points but alot of conjecture on this one.
I don't find Bell Hooks explanation satisfactory either.
Peterson is a jackass but regurgitation of some of the same superficial 90s feminism (which hasn't actually helped the issue of violent young men) is also something to be critiqued.
I've seen a few other articles on this issue and the double standard is astounding.
If a conventional minority group struggles, they need to be helped. If it's a man, screw them! They're oppressive and don't deserve help.
If men are dominant in certain fields, it's a sign of systematic discrimination against women. If women are dominant in certain fields, then that's just because men suck at xyz and this is just the natural outcome.
And the funny part is, I read one article about this and the editor (a middle aged woman as usual) said that this imbalanced ratio is an issue because surprise surprise young women won't have enough men to date!
It's almost like men's issues only matter if it affects women, and somehow that's the only concern.
Lol