theacharnian

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Pierce Morgan

Piers Stefan Pughe-Morgan actually, holy shit

[–] [email protected] 73 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

Absolutely. And the Israelis should dismantle the apartheid, end the occupation, get the fuck on their side of their 1967 border, and recognize the sovereign Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza. Plus, they should hand over their war criminals to the ICC and start a Truth and Reconciliation process. Throw in paying reparations, because why the fuck not.

Somehow I don't think though that ~~Pierce~~ Piers Morgan would accept that as a valid answer when he was asking "what should the Israeli government do". Do you? Because if you do, I will also accept your answer about the terrorist groups. 100%.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We are only to assume that so long as they phone ahead, or put out a tweet or some shit, and then if they say that some IDF-affiliated (or even some Israeli government affiliated) random person was in the general vicinity, it's super fair game to just bomb houses, hospitals, schools, etc, right? RIGHT?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm not American and I think your archaic system is stupid, but there is definitely a difference between Ds and Rs when it comes to Palestine. Ds are like calling for a ceasefire while Rs are saying "finish the job". The Ds are trying to gently (too fucking gently IMO) steer Israel away from genocide, while the Rs are egging Israel on. So, yea, there is a difference. Also, Rs want to call in the army to shoot any students that dare protest the Palestine policy, whereas Ds don't.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (13 children)

To repeat immortal words of the sage ~~Pierce~~ Piers Morgan, "what should the Iranian government do?".

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

He is the leader of a party that is literally called Jewish Power ("Otzma Yehudit") so yes, he runs a named group with political goals and motivations.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Jewish Power ("Otzma Yehudit") is literally the name of the Israeli National Security minister's political party, just like Hamas is literally the name of the Gazan Health minister's political party.

What's good for the goose is good for the fucking gander.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

But not too democratic because then the economy suffers amirite? Like, in the democracies, the poors must always be kept on a leash otherwise they might start getting ideas, right? RIGHT?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We don't call Israeli prisons "Jewish-Power-run" just because they are currently run by Ben-Gvir. Maybe we should though.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Oh no? Because what, the far right settlers who form the base of Jewish Power and Religious Zionism are not terrorists? If you really believe that I know some olive groves in the West Bank that could really use volunteers for the harvest. Or are the settlers justified because they are the chosen whites?

Not to mention that the Jewish-Power-run Ministry holds about 3000 Palestinian hostages:

In August 2023, 1,264 Palestinians were held in administrative detention in Israel, without charge or trial, the highest number in three decades.[42][95][96] After the start of the 2023 Israel–Hamas war, the number of Palestinians held in administrative detention rose from 1,319 to 2,070 between 1 October 2023 and 1 November 2023.[97][98][99] The number of prisoners in administrative detention continued to increase to 3,291 in January 2024.[100][101]

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

So we should also be calling it the Otzma Yehudit-run Ministry of National Security of Israel?

Heh, might as well have some fun with it: The Jewish-Power-run National Security Ministry of Israel. Sounds pretty fucking fascist.

And the Religious-Zionist-run Ministry of Finance of Israel.

They start sounding pretty cooky aren't they?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I thought your laws for example had standards about news vs entertainment, which is why the idiots at Fox keep getting away with misinformation.

14
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Discussions about scarcity and anarchism that I've seen online seem to always talk about "scarcity in the large", i.e. how does an anarchist society allocate production, food, labour, materials etc.

I've a question about anarchism and scarcity in the small. Say, a really nice location, eg. a breezy location in a very hot climate, or the room with the nice windows in the community centre, or Bag End at the top of the hill. Say, an anarchist community has decided to use the location for purpose X, but a minority wants to use it for purpose Y. Maybe an even smaller minority wants to do Z, and a bunch of other people have their own little ideas about how to use it. Some are transient and could be accommodated (you get it on Tuesdays 5-7) but others might not be ("our sculpture project needs to dry out in that specific spot for the next 4 months, we know it blocks the view but it's the only place the breeze hits just right!") or could be contradictory (the siesta people vs the loud backgammon players can't both use the spot at high noon) or antagonistic (the teenagers who want to party late vs the new parents who need quiet for the babies). And dis-association doesn't really help here because that's the nice spot for many kilometers around or there is literally no way to create another beach for our small island community because that's literally the only place on the island where sand exists, so we can't just off and leave. (* Many of these examples are imagining a hot summer in an anarchist Greece, sorry it's almost August.)

It looks to me like a simple non-life-and-death scenario like this could potentially completely poison and destroy a community and in the face of that it would be the little death of anti-authoritarian organizing. Like yea, when life and death matters are at hand, anarchists will band together and conquer the bread. But petty small-scale little shit where it's managing annoyances and small grievances, I don't think non-authoritarian decision making can solve. And I suspect it's crap like this that has killed off many intentional communities and experiments or made them veer away from non-hierarchical, anti-authoritarian organizing.

Have anarchist thinkers seriously thought of this?

 

Submitting for this truly astonishing quote:

" Landlords in Quebec, however, feel they need to catch up to other provinces as Quebec is still one of the most affordable places to live in the country, said Jean-Olivier Reed, a spokesperson for the Quebec Landlord Association (APQ)."

 

The Armenians called, they are asking how the Assyrians and the Pontic Greeks are doing.

view more: ‹ prev next ›