this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
167 points (90.7% liked)

News

23310 readers
3830 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 105 points 11 months ago (5 children)

It is a major turnaround for Musk, who previously said he wouldn’t let Jones back on the platform despite repeated calls to do so. Last year, Musk pointed to the death of his first-born child and tweeted, “I have no mercy for anyone who would use the deaths of children for gain, politics or fame.”

Thankfully for him, his sycophants have the memories of goldfish.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Musk pointed to the death of his first-born child

He lied about his first-born dying in his arms, to win an internet argument:

Elon Musk’s ex-wife refutes his claim that firstborn child died in his arms ... ‘And not that it matters to anyone except me, because it is one of the most sacred and defining moments of my life, but I was the one who was holding him’

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/justine-musk-elon-musk-dying-son-b2234938.html

[–] [email protected] 27 points 11 months ago

It’s easy, considering his knobgobblers are the same sort of people who make up shit to forgive Trump for everything possible. They just have to tell themselves “well Alex Jones didn’t do that, he was framed by LIBRULS”

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"...I have no mercy for anyone who would use the deaths of children..."

Apparently he has mercy for such people now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

How heartwarming 🤮

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Kinda like the time he said he wouldn't ban the jet guy and then did like 3 days later.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I remember some people saying, "nah, you don't see it from his perspective, if your son's life was in trouble and you owned the platform, you'd do the same thing"

I kinda hate that logic because it assumes I'd say the stupid shit enough to put myself into that situation. Not to mention his family's life wasn't actually in danger.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Several people posted proof of him lying about that also, but even if he wasn't, the only thing that changed was he got a full helping of how "free speech absolutism" personally affects him, and maybe that it's not such a great idea?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Goldfish have long memories.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 11 months ago

That'll bring those high-dollar advertisers back to Twitter! Good work!

[–] [email protected] 25 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Still a long way to go to be considered a "free speech absolutist".

He has failed since the start on that front.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I'll start considering his claim of being a "free speech absolutist" when he unbans the account that uses publicly available information to track his private plane.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 11 months ago (2 children)

FYI, he's still tracking Elon's jet, on Mastodon now. @elonjet

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, I check in every so often out of curiosity. He took a 9-minute flight last year.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

His aircraft took a 9 minute flight. Elon was not necessarily on board. Sometimes aircraft are moved for logistical reasons.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Funny, I never hear of large commercial airliners making 9-minute flights for logistical reasons? What logistical reason would that be beyond 'Elon doesn't want to travel all the way to that airport when there's a closer one?'

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Aircraft are moved all the time for logistical reasons. These are known as "empty leg flights".

For example if you will fly from Chicago to NY, but your charter plane will arrive and disembark in Milwaukee. After disembarking, it will take a short flight empty between the two airports.

And all of this is transparent to the passengers. It's not like the charter company says, "Hey if you meet the plane in Milwaukee you can save us the fuel". Kind of like when you call a taxi, the dispatcher doesn't tell you how far the taxi had to drive empty in order to pick you up.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes, from Chicago to New York, fine. This is from one airport in the San Francisco area to another airport in the San Francisco area. Give me the logistical reason for that.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Elon arrives at one airport. Someone else wants to use his jet, departing from a different airport (Elon isn't the only person who uses that aircraft). The plane is moved empty from one airport to the other.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Why can't they just use CalTrans to get to the original airport since it's only five stops between the two and far less polluting?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

The 5 stops on Caltrain between SFO and SJC is disingenuous. Assuming starting at SFO, you need to take BART to Millbrae and then Caltrain to Santa Clara and then a bus to SJC. The whole thing would take like 1hr45min if you timed a baby bullet express train perfectly. But yeah if drove or hired a driver you could get there in 40 min depending on traffic.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Because the passengers don't know where the aircraft is.

So for instance Musk might say "Gwynne Shotwell needs to fly to Austin on my jet on July 1." Shotwell says "I'll fly out of XXX airport". Then in June, Musk flies to YYY airport.

They aren't going to call Shotwell before her flight and say, "Turns out the plane just landed very close to you. Do you mind flying out of YYY instead to save us some fuel?" They simply reposition the plane.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So in other words, it's to be convenient to Elon and his cohorts. Which is what I said earlier. I'm not sure why you think that's justifiable.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It's justified because it's how professional pilots are expected to operate, and there is no reason to make an exception in this case.

For that matter, it's also how car-sharing is expected to operate. Imagine you took an Uber to your hotel, and the driver said "Hey, my next fare is two blocks from your hotel. So how about I drop you off there, it's just a five minute walk the rest of the way. Plus, it would save me from driving with no passenger for a few minutes, thus wasting fuel." I think the vast majority of us would say, "No thanks, drive me all the way to my hotel".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

OMG please let him overestimate his skill as a pilot

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I doubt he pilots them himself.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Yeah that era of billionaire is unfortunately over. Now they just think they’re engineers for some reason.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Thanks! I hadn't realized

[–] [email protected] 36 points 11 months ago

And stops suing journalists for doing journalism.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Lmao and the "critical" customer still slobbered all over Elon's cock afterwards.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don’t think anyone serious or sensible believed that Elton was out to achieve that.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

Elton

Well, he is the Rocket Man

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Read this as “free speech abolitionist”

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago

Checkmate, advertisers!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago

He hadn’t already?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

I'm now convinced he has been replaced by an AI that has been fueled on Reddit comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Knowing Elon and how he has changed this is not too surprising.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

He hasn't changed. He just broke the one rule rich people have. "Don't talk to poor people".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Damn thing tanked

Democrats did it*